Jeroen P. Jansen
Statistics and Probability · 2011–2014
A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 48 citations into it; #7,170 of 12,932 by trust here, #3,102 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 18 citations into it; #22,764 of 23,481 by trust here, #14,505 by citations
Whom Jeroen P. Jansen trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Guobing Lu
- A. Sutton
- A. Ades
- Thomas Lumley
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- Douglas G. Altman
- David J. Spiegelhalter
- S. Thompson
- S. Dias
Who trusts Jeroen P. Jansen overall
- Georgia Salanti
- A. Chaimani
- G. van Valkenhoef
- O. Efthimiou
- S. Dias
- C. Del Giovane
- R. Owen
- T. Debray
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- Huseyin Naci
Papers from Jeroen P. Jansen's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jeroen P. Jansen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
- Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. (Health Technology Assessment)
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (British medical journal)
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence (British medical journal)
- How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
- Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
- Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
- Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (Statistical Methods in Medical Research)
Their papers
- Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. (2011) — 1,027 citations
- Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers (2013) — 574 citations
- Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. (2011) — 751 citations
- Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis. (2014) — 667 citations