J. Hsieh
Information Systems and Management · with Keil · 2008
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Information Systems and Management — 14 citations into it; #1,644 of 3,842 by trust here, #1,450 by citations
- Sociology and Political Science — 12 citations into it
Whom J. Hsieh trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- V. Venkatesh
- David Gefen
- Fred D. Davis
- T. Ravichandran
- Philip M. Podsakoff
- Susan A. Brown
- Huigang Liang
- Detmar W. Straub Jr.
- Scott B. MacKenzie
- Anol Bhattacherjee
Who trusts J. Hsieh overall
- Adamantios Diamantopoulos
- Jörg Henseler
- Juho Hamari
- Christian M. Ringle
- Marko Sarstedt
- Björn Niehaves
Papers from J. Hsieh's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Hsieh trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
- A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies (Management Sciences)
- Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior (MIS Q.)
- A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research
- User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems (MIS Q.)
- Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
- Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model (MIS Q.)
- Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance (European Journal of Information Systems)
- Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model (Information systems research)
- Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management