Michael J. Steiner

2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 0 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Papers from Michael J. Steiner's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Michael J. Steiner trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  2. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey (Annals of Surgery)
  3. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. (The Lancet)
  4. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  5. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis.
  6. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  7. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)
  9. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  10. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))

Their papers