M. Campbell

Statistics and Probability · British medical journal · 2002–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Campbell trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. Douglas G. Altman
  3. K. F. Schulz

Who trusts M. Campbell overall

  1. K. F. Schulz
  2. Douglas G. Altman
  3. David Moher
  4. Kosuke Imai
  5. E. von Elm
  6. Matthew J. Page
  7. Sally Hopewell
  8. France Légaré
  9. Gary King
  10. Karel G. M. Moons

Papers from M. Campbell's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Campbell trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  2. Principles of multilevel modelling. (International Journal of Epidemiology)
  3. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (British medical journal)
  4. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  5. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. (The Lancet)
  6. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  7. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. (Controlled Clinical Trials)
  8. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  9. Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates (New England Journal of Medicine)
  10. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers