Mihoko Murakami

Language and Linguistics · 2008

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Mihoko Murakami trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. John Truscott

Who trusts Mihoko Murakami overall

  1. D. Ferris
  2. N. Storch
  3. K. Karim

Papers from Mihoko Murakami's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Mihoko Murakami trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE?
  2. EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTION: A RESPONSE TO CHANDLER
  3. THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING
  4. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately
  5. Feedback on second language students' writing (Language Teaching)
  6. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students
  7. Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?
  8. The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.
  9. Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students
  10. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction

Their papers