Kai Petersen

Information Systems · 2008–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 19 researchers and is trusted by 25 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Kai Petersen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Barbara A. Kitchenham
  2. David Budgen
  3. Tore Dybå
  4. Pearl Brereton
  5. Claes Wohlin
  6. Magne Jørgensen
  7. Roel J. Wieringa
  8. Vigdis By Kampenes
  9. Samireh Jalali
  10. Jorge Calmon de Almeida Biolchini

Who trusts Kai Petersen overall

  1. Claes Wohlin
  2. Vahid Garousi
  3. Roberto Verdecchia
  4. Samireh Jalali
  5. Martin J. Shepperd
  6. Abdallah Namoun
  7. Barbara A. Kitchenham
  8. Claus Pahl
  9. Michael Felderer
  10. Sebastian Baltes

Papers from Kai Petersen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Kai Petersen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering (IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering)
  2. Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (International Conference on Software Engineering)
  3. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review (Information and Software Technology)
  4. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering (International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering)
  5. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain (Journal of Systems and Software)
  6. Evidence-based software engineering (Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering)
  7. Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion (Requirements Engineering)
  8. A systematic review of statistical power in software engineering experiments (Information and Software Technology)
  9. A Systematic Review of Software Development Cost Estimation Studies (IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering)
  10. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews

Their papers