Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews

By Barbara A. Kitchenham. 2004

5,316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29890a936639862f45cb9a987dd599dce9759bf5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Impacts of knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research (2019, methodology): “The present literature review followed the guidelines advanced by Kitchenham (2004).”
Experiences using systematic review guidelines (2006, methodology): “To work towards this goal, Kitchenham (2004) has recently published guidelines for software engineering researchers performing systematic reviews.”
Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, methodology): “We follow the systematic literature review process suggested by authors of widely cited prior review articles (Bozhikin, Macke, & da Costa, 2019; Kitchenham, 2004; Paul et al., 2017).”
Gamification of e-learning in higher education: a systematic literature review (2023, background): “Kitchenham (2004) summarizes the stages of a systematic review in three main phases: Planning the Review, Conducting the Review, and Reporting the Review.”
Software fault prediction metrics: A systematic literature review (2013, background): “The study was broad and included theoretical and empirical studies which were classiﬁed in the following categories: development, evaluation, analysis, framework, tool programs, use and literature survey.”
Cloud monitoring: A survey (2013, methodology): “According to the indications reported in [126], we adopt the research methodology depicted in Fig.”
The role of Information and Communication Technologies in healthcare: taxonomies, perspectives, and challenges (2018, methodology): “Guided by the relevant best practices [165] and leveraging both Google Scholar and IEEE Explore search engines, we have selected almost 600 scien-”
Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review (2023, background): “The evaluation of the quality of the studies included in our systematic review is a fundamental step to ensure the validity and reliability of the review’s outcomes [127, 279].”
Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research (2021, methodology): “To ensure a robust result, we performed a systematic literature review (Kitchenham 2004) guided by the following question: What are the key findings identified in extant IS research related to the digital divide in contemporary technologically and economically advanced settings?”
Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges (2017, methodology): “For this reason, a research methodology was adopted derived from the existing guidelines used by medical researchers, adapted and optimised for software engineering matters (Kitchenham, 2004).”
A conceptual model of knowledge sharing (2018, methodology): “For identifying the literature relevant to knowledge sharing and business performance, papers were selected following the procedure suggested by Kitchenham (2004).”
Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Survey (2021, background): “Evidence suggests that masking the origin of primary studies does not improve reviews [102].”
Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review (2010, methodology): “To perform this review we followed a systematic and structured method inspired by the guidelines of Kitchenham [46] and Webster et al. [94].”