Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion

By Roel J. Wieringa, N. Maiden, N. Mead, C. Rolland. Requirements Engineering, 2005

982 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd3fde428c91e084b329196ec69380d40e54e16b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering (2008, methodology): “(Wieringa et al. 2006), summarized in Table 3.”
A Systematic Mapping Study in Microservice Architecture (2016, methodology): “We classiﬁed papers using approaches presented in Wieringa [46].”
A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering (2013, methodology): “To use Wieringa’s terminology [38], the current studies are concerned with solution validation not implementation evaluation.”
Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing (2012, background): “[16].”
Design science as nested problem solving (2009, background): “This paper analyzes the mutual nesting of practical problems and knowledge problems, derives some methodological guidelines from this for design science researchers, and gives an example of a design science project following this problem nesting.”
Cloud Migration Research: A Systematic Review (2013, methodology): “These dimensions are derived and refined following a qualitative assessment of included studies and a validation of the review protocol [11], some well-known references [12] [1] [3] [5], and our experience with previous SLRs [13] [14].”
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update (2015, methodology): “[11], the use of that classification being recommended in Petersen et al.”
Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: A systematic mapping study (2018, background): “The existing classification of research types is presented below (Wieringa et al., 2006): • Solution Proposal: A problem solution is proposed.”
Continuous Integration, Delivery and Deployment: A Systematic Review on Approaches, Tools, Challenges and Practices (2017, methodology): “D7) reported in the selected papers, we classified them into six well-known research types: validation research, evaluation research, solution proposal, philosophical paper, opinion paper, and experience report [40].”
Using mapping studies as the basis for further research - A participant-observer case study (2011, methodology): “They suggest that classification of empirical research papers (as opposed to the more general classification of literature proposed by Weiringa et al. [32]) poses a problem particularly for student researchers.”
Current state and future trends: a citation network analysis of the learning analytics field (2014, methodology): “For the analysis of the papers based on their contribution type, we followed the classification scheme commonly adopted in the areas of information systems and software technology [10; 17; 24].”