D. Noble
Statistics and Probability · with Gurevitch · 2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 42 citations into it
Whom D. Noble trusts
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- David Moher (in Statistics and Probability)
Papers from D. Noble's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers D. Noble trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
- Missing inaction: the dangers of ignoring missing data. (Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
- ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (Environmental Evidence)
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
- Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity (Statistics in Medicine)