F. Vanclay

Sociology and Political Science · 2002–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 17 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 25 citations into it; #12,537 of 22,756 by trust here, #12,801 by citations
• Building and Construction — 12 citations into it; #405 of 2,909 by trust here, #885 by citations
• General Agricultural and Biological Sciences — 8 citations into it
• Management of Technology and Innovation — 8 citations into it
• Economics and Econometrics — 7 citations into it
• Global and Planetary Change — 6 citations into it
• Political Science and International Relations — 6 citations into it
• Business and International Management — 5 citations into it

Whom F. Vanclay trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. M. Cernea
2. A. Esteves
3. D. Franks
4. D. Kemp
5. Amartya Sen
6. S. Alkire
7. Liz Alden Wily
8. Brooke Wilmsen
9. E. Smyth
10. S. Neumeier

Who trusts F. Vanclay overall

1. E. Smyth
2. Paula Prenzel
3. A. Esteves
4. D. Kemp
5. Alexi Delgado
6. D. Franks
7. Nick van den Voort
8. Philippe Hanna
9. Michael Kühnen
10. Inmaculada Romero

Papers from F. Vanclay's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers F. Vanclay trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Conceptualising social impacts
2. Social Development Needs Analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: Applications in the minerals industry
3. For a new economics of resettlement: a sociological critique of the compensation principle
4. Risks, safeguards, and reconstruction: a model for population displacement and resettlement.
5. Social impact assessment: the state of the art
6. RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES
7. Commodities and Capabilities
8. The Struggle to Govern the Commons (Science)
9. Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice
10. Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector: Lessons from the Case of Shell and the Ogoni

Their papers

• Social impact assessment: the state of the art (2012) — 435 citations
• Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice (2013) — 152 citations
• Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives (2020) — 281 citations
• Conceptualizing Company Response to Community Protest: Principles to Achieve a Social License to Operate (2019) — 111 citations
• Project-induced displacement and resettlement: from impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development? (2017) — 270 citations
• The Social Framework for Projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects (2017) — 150 citations
• Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands (2015) — 139 citations
• How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management (2014) — 91 citations
• Social Impact Management Plans: Innovation in corporate and public policy (2013) — 133 citations
• Social Development Needs Analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: Applications in the minerals industry (2009) — 178 citations
• Conceptualising social impacts (2002) — 521 citations