Peter Hills

Sociology and Political Science · 2000–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 36 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Peter Hills trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. M. Scheier
  2. V. Saroglou
  3. W. Poortinga
  4. Lennart Sjöberg
  5. Nick F. Pidgeon
  6. C. Carver
  7. Michael Argyle

Who trusts Peter Hills overall

  1. Evangelos Karademas
  2. M. Holder
  3. C. Lewis
  4. Stoney L. Brooks
  5. T. Kashdan
  6. D. Chan
  7. B. Coleman
  8. W. Chui
  9. Warren J. Sillick
  10. L. Toussaint

Papers from Peter Hills's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Peter Hills trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Factors in risk perception. (Risk Analysis)
  2. Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain
  3. Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation (Risk Analysis)
  4. Explaining Individual Risk Perception: The Case of Nuclear Waste
  5. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. (Health Psychology)
  6. Religion and the five factors of personality: a meta-analytic review
  7. Consumer perceptions of smart grid development: Results of a Hong Kong survey and policy implications
  8. Varieties of Religious Experience
  9. The future of an illusion. (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  10. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. (Social Science & Medicine (1967))

Their papers