Individual differences in leisure satisfactions: an investigation of four theories of leisure motivation

By Peter Hills, Michael Argyle, R. Reeves. 2000

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/956f59c03582903a93c048f3d4f20b3f5ac2ae9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. J. Rise
2. Pål Kraft
3. Frode Stenseng
4. Ilan Salomon
5. Sue Yeon Syn
6. Sanghee Oh
7. Matan E. Singer
8. Patricia L. Mokhtarian

Citations in the corpus

• The dark side of leisure: obsessive passion and its covariates and outcomes (2011, background): “Hills, Argyle, & Reeves, 2000 ), but very few of these theories are able to illuminate the maladaptive side of leisure motivation.”
• What Moves Us? An Interdisciplinary Exploration of Reasons for Traveling (2015, methodology): “Finally, Hills et al. (2000) suggest that social considerations play a significant motivational role for leisure, as some activities cannot be done alone or are undertaken to engage in social contact, for example, going to church or voluntary work groups, sports teams, and hobby groups.”
• Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr (2015, background): “Enjoyment is an important desire, leading people to do a variety of leisure activities (Hills, Argyle, & Reeves, 2000).”