T. Parker
Statistics and Probability · 2006–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 42 citations into it
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 23 citations into it; #6,473 of 6,648 by trust here, #4,581 by citations
- Ecology — 14 citations into it
Whom T. Parker trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts T. Parker overall
Papers from T. Parker's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers T. Parker trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
- Missing inaction: the dangers of ignoring missing data. (Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
- ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (Environmental Evidence)
- UV-blue structural coloration and competition for nestboxes in male eastern bluebirds
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)