Jennifer Nagel

General Decision Sciences · 2008–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 18 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Decision Sciences — 11 citations into it
• Philosophy — 6 citations into it; #655 of 1,040 by trust here, #660 by citations
• Artificial Intelligence — 5 citations into it
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 5 citations into it

Whom Jennifer Nagel trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Keith Frankish
2. Alison Gopnik
3. Marcia K. Johnson
4. Ziva Kunda
5. Philip Tetlock
6. J. Lerner
7. Jonathan Evans
8. Adam L. Alter
9. Andrew N. Meltzoff
10. Alvin I. Goldman

Who trusts Jennifer Nagel overall

1. Jonathan Schaffer
2. Chandra Sripada
3. Alison Hills
4. Sarah Moss

Papers from Jennifer Nagel's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jennifer Nagel trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Words, thoughts, and theories
2. The case for motivated reasoning.
3. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
4. The Principles of Psychology
5. Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect.
6. The dilution effect: judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both?
7. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness
8. Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation (Personality and Social Psychology Review)
9. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
10. SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)

Their papers

• EPISTEMIC ANXIETY AND ADAPTIVE INVARIANTISM (2010) — 108 citations
• Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of thinking about Error (2010) — 107 citations
• Knowledge ascriptions and the psychological consequences of changing stakes (2008) — 133 citations