Christopher J. Williams
Materials Chemistry · with Richardson · 2009–2023
A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Materials Chemistry — 137 citations into it
- Molecular Biology — 125 citations into it
Whom Christopher J. Williams trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- G. Sheldrick
- Randy J. Read
- Jane S. Richardson
- Vincent B. Chen
- B. Hintze
- David C Richardson
- Swanand P. Gore
- Gerard J. Kleywegt
- Ian W. Davis
- T. Croll
Who trusts Christopher J. Williams overall
- Abdo A. Elfiky
- Néstor Sampedro Vallina
- J. Beton
- Ewan K. S. McRae
- Michael J. Thompson
- Haitao Liu
- Lim Heo
- Ivan V. Anishchenko
Papers from Christopher J. Williams's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Christopher J. Williams trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-ray Protein Structure Refinement
- Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models.
- Errors in protein structures
- High-resolution structure of a retroviral protease folded as a monomer
- The Uppsala Electron-Density Server.
- PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures
- The penultimate rotamer library
- A short history of SHELX.
- Where freedom is given, liberties are taken.
- A Three-Dimensional Model of the Myoglobin Molecule Obtained by X-Ray Analysis
Their papers
- The other 90% of the protein: Assessment beyond the Cαs for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models (2009) — 84 citations
- Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix (2019) — 5,538 citations
- MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all‐atom structure validation (2018) — 4,020 citations
- Model validation: local diagnosis, correction and when to quit (2018) — 31 citations
- Assessment of detailed conformations suggests strategies for improving cryoEM models: Helix at lower resolution, ensembles, pre-refinement fixups, and validation at multi-residue length scale. (2018) — 18 citations
- AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination (2023) — 298 citations