Shirin Heidari

Research Integrity and Peer Review · 2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom Shirin Heidari trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. K. F. Schulz
  2. David Moher
  3. Douglas G. Altman

Who trusts Shirin Heidari overall

  1. Agostina J. Larrazabal

Papers from Shirin Heidari's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Shirin Heidari trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  2. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials (Obstetrics and Gynecology)
  3. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. (Pain)
  4. The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias against Women in the Treatment of Pain
  5. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies (Nature)
  6. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  7. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  8. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  9. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  10. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers