Gene Feder

Statistics and Probability · 2003–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 16 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Gene Feder trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher

Who trusts Gene Feder overall

  1. Lin-lu Ma
  2. P. Palevsky
  3. Yunyun Wang
  4. Kathleen D. Liu
  5. A. M. MacLeod
  6. Zhi-hua Yang
  7. P. Brophy

Papers from Gene Feder's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Gene Feder trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
  2. A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Schizophrenia (PLoS Medicine)
  3. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  4. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  5. On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. (Biostatistics)
  6. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. (The Lancet)
  7. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. (The Lancet)
  8. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  9. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (British medical journal)
  10. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)

Their papers