Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project

By Gene Feder. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2003

1,369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b053edb10a46aa4abff19f5b4623d05e6976d95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. P. Brophy
2. Xian-Tao Zeng
3. S. Waikar
4. Di Huang
5. C. Parikh
6. Yunyun Wang
7. Kathleen D. Liu
8. Zhi-hua Yang

In Health Information Management

1. P. Brophy
2. Xian-Tao Zeng
3. S. Waikar
4. Di Huang
5. C. Parikh
6. Yunyun Wang
7. Kathleen D. Liu
8. Zhi-hua Yang

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. P. Brophy
2. Xian-Tao Zeng
3. S. Waikar
4. Di Huang
5. C. Parikh
6. Yunyun Wang
7. Kathleen D. Liu
8. Zhi-hua Yang

Citations in the corpus

• 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary (2010, methodology): “The development of these guidelines followed the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) framework.(12) We surveyed primary care physicians, patients, osteoporosis specialists from various disciplines, radiologists, allied health professionals and health policy-makers to identify pr”
• Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) (2011, positive): “These recommendations were developed according to the process described by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Collaboration [2].”