Inbal Nahum-Shani

Statistics and Probability · 2014–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Inbal Nahum-Shani trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Susan A. Murphy
  2. Philip W. Lavori
  3. Linda M. Collins
  4. R. Dawson
  5. Matthew Price
  6. Katie Witkiewitz
  7. M. Bouton
  8. Jonathan Evans
  9. Brant R. Burleson
  10. David C. Mohr

Who trusts Inbal Nahum-Shani overall

  1. D. Almirall
  2. Daniel M. Low
  3. Anya Johnson
  4. A. Chronis-Tuscano

Papers from Inbal Nahum-Shani's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Inbal Nahum-Shani trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Continuous inference of psychological stress from sensory measurements collected in the natural environment (Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks)
  2. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems (Personal and Ubiquitous Computing)
  3. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? (Translational Behavioral Medicine)
  4. The Law of Attrition (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  5. Clinical Trials : A Methodologic Perspective
  6. Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  7. Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  8. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models (Behavior Research Methods)
  9. Supportive Accountability: A Model for Providing Human Support to Enhance Adherence to eHealth Interventions (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  10. Relapse prevention for alcohol and drug problems: that was Zen, this is Tao. (American Psychologist)

Their papers