Samantha McGinty

Education · 2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Samantha McGinty trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. N. Falchikov
  2. J. D. Creswell
  3. David J. Nicol
  4. Dana L. Miller

Papers from Samantha McGinty's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Samantha McGinty trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses
  2. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education
  3. Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
  4. The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  5. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement
  6. A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice
  7. The quality of guidance and feedback to students
  8. Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality
  9. Comments on Essays: Do students understand what tutors write?
  10. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice

Their papers