S. Buecker
Statistics and Probability · 2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 19 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 24 citations into it
- Social Psychology — 22 citations into it
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 13 citations into it
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 12 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 10 citations into it
- Applied Psychology — 8 citations into it
- Economics and Econometrics — 7 citations into it
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine — 6 citations into it
Whom S. Buecker trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- W. Viechtbauer
- E. Tanner‐Smith
- Mike W.-L. Cheung
- Elizabeth Tipton
- Julian P. T. Higgins
- H. Cooper
- T. Stanley
- Gilles E. Gignac
- L. Hedges
- Stephen Raudenbush
Papers from S. Buecker's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Buecker trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
- Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models.
- Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
- The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
- Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and spss (Research Synthesis Methods)
- A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
- Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (International Coaching Psychology Review)
- Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. (Psychological methods)
- Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
Their papers
- Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Traits: A Meta–Analysis (2020) — 312 citations
- The effects of imagery interventions in sports: a meta-analysis (2020) — 144 citations