L. DeCamp

2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 0 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom L. DeCamp trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. Julian P. T. Higgins
  3. A. Liberati
  4. Douglas G. Altman

Who trusts L. DeCamp overall

  1. Adamantia Spatioti
  2. Mohammed Adnan
  3. Ioannis Kazanidis

Papers from L. DeCamp's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. DeCamp trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  2. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey (Annals of Surgery)
  3. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  4. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. (The Lancet)
  5. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis.
  6. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  7. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  8. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  9. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  10. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)

Their papers