Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability

By S. Tamer Cavusgil, Roger J. Calantone, Yushan Zhao. 2003

926 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffad564627c8298ea35f93517095084955146985

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review (2021, background): “…difficult for companies, which are forced to make use of a collaborative network (Najafi-Tavani, Najafi-Tavani, Naud ´ e, Oghazi, & Zeynaloo, 2018) inside and outside the organization, which is useful for promoting the sharing of knowledge for innovation (Cavusgil, Calantone, & Zhao, 2003).”
Organizational learning, entrepreneurial orientation, and the role of university engagement in SMEs (2016, background): “Tacit knowledge resides in the firm’s system and is difficult to transfer (Cavusgil et al., 2003).”
Knowledge management issues in knowledge-intensive SMEs (2006, background): “More pragmatically, tacit knowledge can be described as experience that is embedded in an individual such as perspective and inferential knowledge.”
The impact of knowledge management on innovation and entrepreneurship in the biotechnology and telecommunications industries (2009, background): “The codification of the tacit knowledge gathered by the members of an organization enables knowledge diffusion to take place ( Cavusgil et al. 2003; Nonaka 1994).”
The Geography of Complex Knowledge (2017, background): “The cost of acquisition is critical for some (Howells 2002), and is thought to rise with the tacit nature of knowledge and its complexity (Cavusgil, Calantone, and Zhao 2003), although the cost of its absorption is key for others (Cohen and Levinthal 1990).”