Memory systems of the brain: a brief history and current perspective.

By L. R. Squire. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2004

2,151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff96fff4b7b211e54ae049888a6cc05786e6c378

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Bridging the Gap: Converting Human Advice into Imagined Examples (2019, methodology): “Our framework, further elaborated on in Section 2, is guided by multiple memory systems theory1 (Sherry & Schacter, 1987; Squire, 2004) and is based on the following core theoretical ideas:”
Improving Cultural Analysis (2017, positive): “The resulting cross-classification is shown in Figure 1, a diagram modeled after similar branching depictions in the literature on memory systems (e.g., Squire 2004).”
Schemas and Frames (2018, methodology): “Finally, schemas are a form of nondeclarative memory (Squire 1992, 2004)—acquired, used, and altered through a repeated, automatic process of schematization from experience (Lizardo 2017; Lizardo et al. 2016).7 Schemas are not encoded in memory quickly (as one might memorize a word or phrase, for…”
Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria. (2010, positive): “Although these constructs are well studied (see e.g., D’Esposito, Postle, & Rypma, 2000; Hopfinger, Buoncore, & Mangun, 2000; Pochon, Riis, Sanfey, Nystrom, & Cohen, 2008; Squire, 2004), they might be analyzed into finer grained components to isolate abnormalities.”
The restless engram: consolidations never end. (2012, background): “236 How It Might Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238 CONSOLIDATIONS INTEGRATED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 ON THE RECONSOLIDATION OF TERMS AND IDEAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241”
The Anatomy of Motivation: An Evolutionary-Ecological Approach (2013, neutral): “(Barnes et al. 2005; Squire 2004; Tulving 1985).”
Act-In: An integrated view of memory mechanisms (2014, background): “In the multi-system models (Sherry & Schacter, 1987; Squire, 2004; Tulving, 1995), even though the content varies depending on the memory system in question, there is always a correspondence between the content of the relevant memory system and, at the phenomenological level, the nature of the…”
Autobiographically Significant Concepts: More Episodic than Semantic in Nature? An Electrophysiological Investigation of Overlapping Types of Memory (2015, methodology): “Neuropsychological studies of AS have reported a dissociation between two groups of patients: those in the early stages of semantic dementia who show a preservation of the performance advantage for high compared with low AS names and those with MTL amnesia who do not show this effect (Westmacott et ”
Model-Free Episodic Control (2016, background): “In the brain, this form of very fast learning is critically supported by the hippocampus and related medial temporal lobe structures [1, 34].”
Bilingual brain training: A neurobiological framework of how bilingual experience improves executive function (2012, background): “…declarative memory is thought to be underpinned by cortical structures, and in particular with the temporal lobe (for the encoding of information: Squire, 1992, 2004) and the left inferior frontal gyrus (for the retrieval of information: Sohn, Goode, Stenger, Carter, & Anderson, 2003;…”
Training-induced structural changes in the adult human brain. (2008, background): “Our main hypothesis targeted medial temporal lobe structures known to be involved in various memory processes [34,98].”
Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? (2009, background): “Squire and colleagues (2007; also Squire, 2004; Wais, 2008; Wixted, 2007) argued that differences between activity in hippocampus and perirhinal cortex that are usually ascribed to recollection and familiarity processes confound memory strength with the basis for that strength (e.g., the experience…”