Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria.

By C. Sanislow, Daniel S. Pine, K. Quinn, M. Kozak, M. Garvey, R. Heinssen, P. Wang, B. Cuthbert. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2010

734 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3f5b3e5f292fee43ac132535048d10429516655

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

SLEEP AND MENTAL DISORDERS: A META-ANALYSIS OF POLYSOMNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH (2016, background): “To this end, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) proposed the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project (Morris, Rumsey & Cuthbert, 2014; Cuthbert & Kozak, 2013; Sanislow et al., 2010) to identify basic dimensions of brain/mind disorders to be studied across multiple units of analysis, from”
The reward positivity: from basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression. (2015, positive): “…Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative has emphasized the need to understand dysfunction in core neural systems that may underlie dimensional individual differences that cut across disorders (Cuthbert & Insel, 2013; Insel et al., 2010; Sanislow et al., 2010).”
Assertiveness Training: A Forgotten Evidence-Based Treatment (2018, background): “For example, within the RDoC framework, problems of assertiveness may be investigated under the “Social Processes” domain, which focuses on the dynamic processes used in social interaction, including the motivation and ability to engage in effective social communication (Sanislow et al., 2010).”
The Four-Function Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (2014, background): “This novel approach to classifying psychopathology attempts to focus on fundamental mechanisms underlying a broad range of phenomena (e.g., Morris & Cuthbert, 2012; Sanislow et al., 2010), thereby representing a marked change from the current categorical system based on clinical observation and pati”
Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM–5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods (2011, methodology): “Furthermore, the Levels of Personality Functioning constructs align well with the National Institute for Mental Health Research Domain Criterion (RDoC) of “social processes” (Sanislow et al., 2010).”
Trait Repetitive Negative Thinking: A Brief Transdiagnostic Assessment (2014, result): “Nolen-Hoeksema and Watkins’ (2011) model of multi-finality and divergent trajectories, which describes purported common and distinct contributors to emotional disorders, is consistent with the recent emphasis on etiological models and mechanisms to guide classification systems and research prioritie”
The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders? (2014, background): “It may not be perfect (Sanislow et al., 2010), but it is what many of us work with in both research and clinical practice (Kupfer, Kuhl, & Regier, 2013).”
Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC (2013, background): “science (for example, [19,20]); as a result, it becomes very difficult to translate research from basic studies, either in”
What We’ve Learned From Mistakes (2012, result): “Rather than treating the ERN as a dependent variable (i.e., what distinguishes anxious from nonanxious groups), neurobehavioral traits such as the ERN can be utilized as independent variables that could help refine, or even define, distinct phenotypes that may otherwise not be obvious from factor-an”
Genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (2018, positive): “harmonizes with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative of the National Institute of Mental Health [152].”
A Heuristic for Developing Transdiagnostic Models of Psychopathology (2011, background): “The recent Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative is specifically focused on intermediate phenotypes that can be linked to problems of neural circuitry and functioning, such as excessive fear, disruptions in working memory, and poor impulse control (Insel & Cuthbert, 2009; Sanislow et al., 2010)”
The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): Final Development and Validation (2013, background): “Thus, items in the CAINS tap constructs covering approach motivation, pleasure, social engagement, and affective expression, which are also part of the NIMHResearch Domain Criteria (5, 6).”