Human Performance: Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction (2003, unknown): “Matthews et al .”
Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. (2002, methodology): “Items were sampled on the basis of a review of the main explanatory constructs used in studies of stress, emotion, and performance (Matthews et al., 2000), as follows:”
The relationship between personality traits, subjectively-assessed and fluid intelligence (2005, methodology): “Whereas general intellectual ability appears to be theoretically unrelated to non-cognitive traits (Brebner & Stough, 1995; Eysenck, 1994; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000), traits have been proven to relate to test performance and, since intellectual ability is measured through performance (ability/ IQ),…”
Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance (2003, result): “This would confirm previous findings (Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2002) and the idea that Neuroticism is associated with stress and physical illness (Matthews et al., 2000).”
Personality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades (2004, background): “Furthermore, researchers have noted that Neuroticism may also impair performance on psychometric intelligence tests (Boyle, 1983; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000).”