Assessment of Protein Model Structure Accuracy Estimation in CASP14: Old and New Challenges

By Sohee Kwon, Jonghun Won, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Chaok Seok. 2021

51 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In CASP, blind testing of model accuracy estimation methods has been conducted on models submitted by tertiary structure prediction servers. In CASP14, model accuracy estimation results were evaluated in terms of both global and local structure accuracy, as in the previous CASPs. Unlike the previous CASPs that did not show pronounced improvements in performance, the best single‐model method (from the Baker group) showed an improved performance in CASP14, particularly in evaluating global structure accuracy when compared to both the best single‐model methods in previous CASPs and the best multi‐model methods in the current CASP. Although the CASP14 experiment on model accuracy estimation did not deal with the structures generated by AlphaFold2, new challenges that have arisen due to the success of AlphaFold2 are discussed.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Andriy Kryshtafovych
  2. Torsten Schwede
  3. Krzysztof Fidelis
  4. Yang Zhang
  5. John Moult
  6. Bohdan Monastyrskyy
  7. Maya Topf
  8. Rhiju Das

In Molecular Biology

  1. Andriy Kryshtafovych
  2. Torsten Schwede
  3. Yang Zhang
  4. Krzysztof Fidelis
  5. John Moult
  6. Bohdan Monastyrskyy
  7. Rhiju Das
  8. R. Rangan

Citations in the corpus