Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights
By Sunil Kanwar. 2006
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fdac37dbfc30318247519ad9d8801e36283cefd3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Giovanni Dosi
- Bart Verspagen
- Luigi Marengo
- Corrado Pasquali
- Rudi Bekkers
- J. Fagerberg
- John H. Dunning
- S. Lundan
Citations in the corpus
- Innovation and Economic Development (2009, background): “The increasing attention to IPRs in both developed and developing countries and their mutual relationship (for example the TRIPS agreement, see Granstrand 2004) may to some extent reflect this shift of emphasis in economic theorizing.”
- How much should society fuel the greed of innovators?: On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation (2006, background): “…the transistor, while being patented from Bell Labs, was liberally licensed also as a consequence of antitrust litigation and pressure from the US Justice Department: its early producers nonetheless obtained enough revenue to be the seeds of the emergence of a whole industry (Grandstrand 2005).”
- The problem of private under-investment in innovation: A policy mind map (2008, unknown): “One example is the strengthening of appropriability conditions through an effective system of intellectual property rights (Granstrand, 2005).”
- An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Essential Patent Claims in Compatibility Standards (2011, background): “The clash took place against a background of liberalisation and privatisation in the European telecommunications sector, the socalled pro-patent era (Granstrand, 2005), and the disappearance of exclusive, long-term relations between network operators and their suppliers.”
- The Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Review of the Evidence and Some Policy Implications for Home Countries1 (2009, background): “…policy concern for home countries arises from the fact that particularly in the technologically advanced countries, the appropriation of returns from innovation is strongly conditioned by the surrounding institutions, especially in the area of IP protection (Granstrand, 2005; Teece, 1992, 2006).”