Technology and Equity in Schooling: Deconstructing the Digital Divide

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review of the “Digital Turn” in the New Literacy Studies (2010, background): “Digital media arts and community-linked digital production programs have particularly aimed to enhance technological capacities and engagement among students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (Resnick, Rusk, & Cooke, 1998; Warschauer, Knobel, & Stone, 2004).”
New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes (2010, background): “…technology use in high– and low– socioeconomic status (SES) communities found that the low-SES neighborhood schools tended to have less stable teaching staff, administrative staff, and IT support staff, which made planning for technology use more difficult (Warschauer, Knobel, & Stone, 2004).”
Teachers' Perceptions of Integrating Information and Communication Technologies into Literacy Instruction: A National Survey in the United States (2011, methodology): “Of those 8 items, the following have been identiﬁed as obstacles in the existing literature: ● Lack of time within a class period (Bauer & Ken-ton, 2005) ● Lack of access to technology (Bauer & Kenton, 2005; Honan, 2008; Stolle, 2008; Zhao et al., 2002) ● Lack of technical support (Bauer & Kenton, 2”