Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat

By E. V. Loo, Vincenzina Caputo, R. Nayga, Wim Verbeke. 2014

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fd54b7fd4dfed68b4d67a2095dd3861331fb5fb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. John Th⊘gersen
2. Fraser McLeay
3. Chrysostomos Apostolidis

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John Th⊘gersen
2. K. Nielsen
3. Fraser McLeay
4. Chrysostomos Apostolidis
5. David Lois
6. Mercedes López-Sáez

In Plant Science

1. John Th⊘gersen
2. Fraser McLeay
3. Chrysostomos Apostolidis
4. Sebastian Koos

Citations in the corpus

• Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution (2016, methodology): “…labels have been recommended as effective ways to communicate the production related characteristics of meat and meat substitutes, including production method, environmental impact, origin and type of product (de Jonge et al., 2015; Van Loo et al., 2014; Koistinen et al., 2013; Hoek et al., 2011).”
• A better carbon footprint label (2016, background): “This effect has been explained by negativity bias (Van Dam and De Jonge, 2015).”