A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering

By Barbara A. Kitchenham, Pearl Brereton. Information and Software Technology, 2013

1,042 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects (2015, methodology): “This study has been undertaken as a systematic literature review (SLR) based upon guidelines established by Kitchenham et al. [43, 44].”
Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, neutral): “As a way of mapping this scenario, we used the systematic literature review methodology to choose the studies [31-33].”
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update (2015, methodology): “[17] and Kitchenham and Brereton [8] the use if IEEE and ACM as well as two indexing databases (e.”
A systematic review of Green AI (2023, methodology): “In addition, throughout our study, we followed the recommendations of the guidelines for conducting a systematic literature review (Kitchenham, 2004; Kitchenham & Brereton, 2013; Mayring et al., 2004; Petersen et al., 2015; Wohlin, 2014).”
News recommender systems - Survey and roads ahead (2018, background): “, [94], where pre-defined search queries and inclusion and exclusion criteria are used.”
A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems (2017, background): “Such reviews are common in the medical and social sciences and are increasingly adopted in the field of computer science [121].”