Attitudes Toward, and Intentions to Report, Academic Cheating Among Students in Singapore

By Vivien K. G. Lim, Sean K. B. See. 2001

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study (2010, background): “Only a few studies have been conducted to explore students' perceptions of plagiarism, and these tend to focus on the reasons why students plagiarise (Ashworth, Bannister, and Thorne 1997 ; Devlin and Gray 2007 ; Marsden, Carroll, and Neill 2005 ), or utilise attitude scales that are developed wi”
Academic Dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and Contextual Factors (2008, background): “Some of these studies emphasize the effect of the perceived level of peers’ cheating on a student’s cheating behavior (Underwood and Szabo 2003; Lim and See 2001 ).”
Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study (2005, background): “In a similar vein, Lim and See [17] found that academic cheating was perceived by students to be less serious than plagiarizing or not contributing equally in a group project.”
Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism (2008, methodology): “Perceived seriousness is an important issue to explore, as the literature suggests perceived seriousness is inversely related to cheating behaviours, including plagiarism (Brown & Howell, 2001; Jensen et al., 2002; Lim & See, 2001; Storch & Storch, 2003).”