The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution

By K. Binder, S. Duffy, Keith Rayner. 2001

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes (2007, background): “Ferreira and Clifton, 1986; Frazier, 1987), with other factors affecting only a later stage of processing (Binder et al., 2001; Frazier et al., 2006; Rayner et al., 1992).”
Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the Selective Reanalysis hypothesis (2008, background): “In practice, while one or two studies have taken on the task of modelling measures that incorporate regressive fixations (Binder et al., 2001; Konieczny & Döring, 2003), there seems to have been only one study that has responded to the challenge of predicting the prevalence of regressions at…”
The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited (2003, background): “Another potentially-informative approach is to examine the processing of normally-preferred structures, where Frazier (1995) claims strong tests of competing models are possible (and where, we note, Binder, Duffy, & Rayner, 2001, have provided direct evidence against current implemented constraint”