An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance
By Soo Wook Kim. 2009
420 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc78b7bc22b629d7bb44e6281c2ffc95aff05d13
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Dong-Young Kim
- Sanjoy Kumar Paul
- Yi Ding
- Sobhan Asian
- Dawei Lu
- Wantao Yu
- Mark A. Jacobs
- Chee Yew Wong
In Strategy and Management
- Dong-Young Kim
- Sanjoy Kumar Paul
- Yi Ding
- Sobhan Asian
- Dawei Lu
- Angappa Gunasekaran
- Wantao Yu
- Mark A. Jacobs
Citations in the corpus
- The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation (2013, background): “Introduction Internal integration (II) and external integration (EI) are widely accepted as having the ability to improve operational performance outcomes, such as quality, cost, delivery and flexibility (e.g., Ragatz et al., 1997; Kim, 2009; Flynn et al., 2010; Wong et al., 2011a; Prajogo & Olhager”
- From Supply Chain Integration to Operational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Market Uncertainty (2018, background): “We argue that it is far from being certain that the level of the SCI integration will always be positively correlated with the optimum performance (Graham et al. 2005; Wook Kim 2006; Kim 2009).”
- Data-driven supply chains, manufacturing capability and customer satisfaction (2017, background): “The above premises suggest that manufacturing capability can represent the short-term objective of a firm that focus on productivity and effectiveness, whereas the long-term objective is business performance (Kim 2009).”
- Relationship between supply chain integration and performance (2013, background): “In this respect, this type of integration is called supplier product integration, or a black box approach, because a supplier is mainly considered as a provider of a product and is trusted in respect to the quality, cost, and performance of a product (Koufteros et al. 2007; Kim 2009).”
- Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): an empirical investigation on French industrial firms (2014, background): “The effects of supply chain integration (SCI) on performance have been already studied (Kim 2009) in different sectors and countries including Korean and Japanese firms (Narasimhan and Kim 2002; Kim 2009), the German automotive industry (Thun and Hoenig 2011), the North American automotive industry ”
- The impact of supply chain integration on company performance: an organizational capability perspective (2012, background): “, 2001a, b) and FP (e.g. Droge et al., 2004; Flynn et al., 2010; Frohlich and Westbrook, 2001; Germain and Iyer, 2006; Johnson, 1999; Kim, 2009; Koufteros et al., 2005; Narasimhan and Kim, 2002; Petersen et al., 2005; Rosenzweig et al., 2003; Swink et al., 2007; Swink and Song, 2007).”
- Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance (2014, result): “We find that hypothesis H3 is significant (with t-coefficients¼7.3) supporting findings from prior research (e.g. Vickery et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2004; Kim, 2009) relating SC strategy, supply chain performance, and firm performance.”
- The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective (2013, background): “Through cross-functional integration within a firm and integration with suppliers and/or customers superior supply chain performance can be achieved (Kim, 2009; Swink et al., 2007; Van der Vaart and Van Donk, 2008; Zailani and Rajagopal, 2005; Zhao et al., 2011).”