Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework

By Jochen Markard, Bernhard Truffer. 2008

1,344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc68d75e809d4699610abb080e1934fc0a1143b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Exploring the Transition Potential of Renewable Energy Communities (2015, methodology): “Markard and Truffer (2008) also claim that niches are protected spaces, which are similar to the regime in their structure; although the scale of aggregation and stability is much lower in this case.”
Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation (2011, background): “Three inter-related levels are identified: regimes, landscapes, and niches (Geels and Schot 2007; Markard and Truffer 2008).”
Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration—Brazil (2009, background): “In a similar vein, novel technologies or products that emerge in competing innovation systems (and thus affect the innovation under study) may be neglected in the analysis (Markard and Truffer, 2008).”
Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics (2019, background): “Depending on their specific focus, innovation systems can have different geographical (national, regional), sectoral or technological boundaries (Hekkert et al., 2007; Markard and Truffer, 2008).”
Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring: Industry Formation for On-Site Water Recycling in Beijing (2016, background): “TIS research focuses on three conceptual building blocks: actors, networks and institutions (Markard and Truffer 2008; Bergek, et al. 2008a; Hekkert, et al. 2007).”
Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry (2012, background): “The automotive industry may be said to be prominent in the electric vehicle technological innovation system [51], but the ability to foster radical change may be encumbered by similar deleterious path dependency.”
Investing in low-carbon transitions: energy finance as an adaptive market (2017, methodology): “To frame this analysis, the authors draw on the ‘three domains of planetary economics’ proposed by Grubb, Hourcade, and Neuhoff (2014), co-evolutionary change approaches (Foxon, 2011), and theories of ‘adaptive’ finance (Lo, 2004, 2012; Soufian, Forbes, & Hudson, 2014).”
Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies (2015, background): “Instead, niche level processes have been the main focus of MLP studies (Markard and Truffer, 2008b).”
The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system (2009, background): “Although, a TIS is often international in nature, system delineation usually encompasses a further specification in spatial terms, depending on the purpose of the analysis (Markard and Truffer, 2008).”
The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech (2015, background): “Criticizing the TIS framework for neglecting transnational dimensions may therefore appear paradoxical, as the concept has originally been suggested as an alternative to territorial innovation system concepts that depart from strict geographic boundaries (Bergek et al., 2008b; Markard and Truffer, 2”
Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment (2010, background): “In the study of innovation systems, this reflexive relationship between actors and their institutional environment that actors may adapt, change, or complement has been called mutual embeddedness (Markard and Truffer, 2008).”