A Comparison of Four Methods for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Ordered Response Items
By E. Kristjansson, R. Aylesworth, I. Mcdowell, Bruno D. Zumbo. 2005
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc54bb8ea38346cccfeaf4e98a023a10048f7538
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- A Synthesis of 15 Years of Research on DIF in Language Testing: Methodological Advances, Challenges, and Recommendations (2007, result): “Yet research suggests that the utilization of a single method is undesirable and might represent an oversimplification due to a method effect, because different statistical methods typically yield conflicting results, at least for some items (eg, Ferne, Choi, & Rupp, 2005 ; Greer, 2004 ; Holmes, ”
- Does the EDI Measure School Readiness in the Same Way Across Different Groups of Children? (2007, background): “Investigating item bias is important, because item bias presents a threat to the validity and fairness of a test or scale ( Kristjansson, Aylesworth, McDowell, & Zumbo, 2005 ; Zumbo, 2007 ).”