Are Family Firms Really More Socially Responsible?
By C. Cruz, Martín Larraza-Kintana, Lucía Garcés-Galdeano, P. Berrone. 2014
502 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc481a501c180c4a873f6607c913e49bd00674cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Tarek Abdelfattah
- Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
- C. Cruz
- I. Neacşu
- María Concepción López-Fernández
- Soumodip Sarkar
- Remedios Hernández‐Linares
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Tarek Abdelfattah
- C. Cruz
- María Concepción López-Fernández
- Soumodip Sarkar
- Remedios Hernández‐Linares
- Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Luis R. Gómez-Mejía
- C. Cruz
- Tarek Abdelfattah
- I. Neacşu
- María Concepción López-Fernández
- Soumodip Sarkar
- Remedios Hernández‐Linares
Citations in the corpus
- The effect of socioemotional wealth on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and family business performance (2019, background): “The need to maintain control over the firm is a core element of SEW (Berrone et al., 2012; Cruz et al., 2014), and a significant amount of emotional wealth is derived from keeping the firm’s control in family hands (Berrone et al.”
- Corporate Social Responsibility during COVID-19 Pandemic (2020, background): “considering the existence of a link between the CEO’s profile, the interests of the majority owners, and the CSR actions carried out [47].”
- Family firm internationalization: heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias (2018, unknown): “, 2012, 2016); and (2) the specific contexts, both domestic and international ones, within which family firms operate (Wright et al., 2014; Carney, Gedajlovic, and Strike, 2014; Cruz et al., 2014).”
- Tax avoidance, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility: The case of the Egyptian capital market (2020, result): “While some studies find a positive relationship between family firms and CSR practices (Berrone et al., 2010; Bingham et al., 2011; Cruz et al., 2014; Dyer & Whetten, 2006; Sharma and Sharma, 2011), other studies report a negative relationship (Morck & Yeung, 2004).”
- Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research (2018, background): “The empirical studies that apply the SEW perspective mainly focus on influencing factors, such as family involvement, and on socially responsible actions.”
- Is nepotism so bad for family firms? A socioemotional wealth approach (2018, methodology): “Building on contemporary research portraying SEW as a “situational” framework (Cruz et al., 2014), we reexamine the nepotismperformance relationship using a contingency approach based on environmental characteristics.”