Joint Venture Performance Revisited: Japanese Foreign Subsidiaries Worldwide (1)

By Andrew Delios, Paul W. Beamish. 2004

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc0ae5222b7cf862b7310b9d16764e0d7e7b5299

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Place, space, and geographical exposure: Foreign subsidiary survival in conflict zones (2013, unknown): “Our approach has been validated by scholars who compared identified cases of exit in the TK data with reported cases of exit (Delios & Beamish, 2004).”
The regional nature of Japanese multinational business (2008, result): “Other, more quantitative and representative studies match our findings for Sumitomo Chemical and Nippon Steel ( Delios & Beamish, 2001, 2004; Jameson, Sullivan, & Constand, 2000).”
Equity control and the survival of international joint ventures: a contingency approach (2005, background): “Researchers have reported a positive relationship (Killing, 1983; Delios and Beamish, 2004), a negative relationship (Beamish, 1984; Lu, 2000) or no clear relationship at all (Kogut, 1988; Steensma and Lyles, 2000) between dominant foreign equity control and IJV performance.”
Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions (2012, background): “For example, some scholars suggest full ownership is a better governance mechanism for managing foreign subsidiaries (Delios & Beamish, 2004; Gaur & Lu, 2007), but others claim shared ownership is preferable (Lu, 2000).”
Ownership Strategies and Survival of Foreign Subsidiaries: Impacts of Institutional Distance and Experience (2007, background): “Examining the relationship between ownership strategy and subsidiary performance, scholars have found positive, negative, and no relationships between foreign equity control and subsidiary performance (Delios & Beamish, 2004; Geringer & Hebert, 1989).”