Food fights in house crickets, Acheta domesticus, and the effects of body size and hunger level
By P. Nosil. 2002
82 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbe943dee1adfb688220424a05115892b0a63976
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- W. D. Brown
- J. Hunt
- M. A. Shackleton
- Adam T Smith
- Brian Moskalik
- Michael D. Jennions
- Mark Briffa
- Josh Gabriel
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size? (2008, background): “House crickets are a highly tractable model system for the study of animal contests (Adamo & Hoy 1995; Hack 1997a, b; Nosil 2002; Brown et al. 2006).”
- Aggressive contests in house crickets: size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs (2006, background): “Our results reinforce the view that body mass is the most important determinant of RHP in crickets and most other animals (Alexander 1961; Dixon & Cade 1986; Simmons 1986; Souroukis & Cade 1993; Hack 1997; Nosil 2002; Shackleton et al. 2005; but see Tachon et al. 1999).”
- Fighting success and attractiveness as predictors of male mating success in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus: the effectiveness of no-choice tests (2005, background): “There is a stereotypical sequence of events when male field crickets fight (Evans 1983; Hack 1997; Hofmann and Stevenson 2000; Nosil 2002).”