Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size?
By Mark Briffa. 2008
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/750eb30de17aed97a4bdb5f570164d7cc69b6e2e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
Citations in the corpus
- Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests (2009, background): “2007), house crickets, Acheta domesticus (Briffa 2008), jumping spiders, Phidippus clarus (Elias et al.”
- Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests (2009, methodology): “Furthermore, Briffa (2008) used the approach advocated by Taylor & Elwood (2003) to find support for CAM in male house cricket contests but subsequently questioned this support based on studies (Hack 1997a, b) showing both escalation and de-escalation, in terms of the choice of agonistic tactic, whi”
- Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish (2011, background): “Contest behaviour that does not conform precisely to any of the existing models has been observed in a variety of taxa (e.g. Jennings et al. 2004; Briffa & Elwood 2002; Kelly 2006; Briffa 2008; Elias et al. 2008; Hsu et al. 2008).”