The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and

By Henry Etzkowitz, Loet Leydesdorff. 2000

7,292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb5cb68e2ef13342d76b639dc5bcd912039f43ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept (2006, background): “…in science and technology policy from an &TS standpoint are the ‘New Production of Knowldge’ approach of Gibbons (1994) and the ‘Triple Helix odel’ (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 1997, 1998, 2000). n contrast to the NIS concept, these perspectives have een debated and discussed broadly in S&TS…”
Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future (2020, background): “Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000) have further expounded the Triple Helix into a model for studying knowledge-based economies.”
Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage (2009, background): “, 2004), or in terms of a dynamic model like the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (Leydesdorff, 1994; Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 2000).”
Local Labour Markets and the Interregional Mobility of Italian University Students (2013, methodology): “In recent years, we assist to an extension of universities functions with the inclusion of technology transfer activities and as incubator of new firms (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 2000).”
Entrepreneurship education and training as facilitators of regional development: A systematic literature review (2017, background): “regulators and promoters of economic activities) interact with each other in order to generate new knowledge, technological innovation and economic development (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 2000).”
The Internationalization of Corporate R&D and the Automotive Industry R&D of East-Central Europe (2012, background): “…spheres of university, industry, and government, conceptualized as the “triple helix” of innovation, has particularly been stressed for the development of innovation in the national and regional contexts (e.g., Leydesdorff and Etzkowitz 1998; Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 2000; Schamp 2002).”
Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation — A theoretical analysis (2012, neutral): “Actually, this argument is consistent with the NSI core concept whereby multifarious efforts foster different kinds of collaboration and networking activity [39,40].”
The Spatial Evolution of Innovation Networks: A Proximity Perspective (2010, background): “Another example of a lack of institutional proximity is in university-industry-government or 'triple helix' relationships (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 2000), where different key actors operate in different institutional regimes.”
Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature (2003, background): “…dense nodes in a web of local and distant contacts maintained by the actors involved” (ibid, p. 115) The central role played by the interaction between universities, firms and governments in regional and local knowledge agglomeration has also been emphasised by Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000).”