Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature

By J. Fagerberg. 2003

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/faa998858b27a43d44ae1ab86254c7ba83f59281

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Fagerberg
2. Bart Verspagen
3. Martin Srholec
4. Aurora A. C. Teixeira
5. T. Foxon
6. E. Silva
7. Maureen McKelvey
8. Franco Malerba

Citations in the corpus

• Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account (2008, background): “See Fagerberg (2003) for a discussion on the matter.”
• Innovation and Economic Development (2009, background): “8 See Fagerberg (2003, 2004) for an extended discusson of the Schumpeterian contribution and different definitions of innovation.”
• The Free-Market Innovation Machine (2014, background): “As is well known Schumpeter did during his lifetime consider two different ways to organize innovation in capit alist firms (Fagerberg 2003).”
• A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations (2012, background): “See also Fagerberg (2002, 2003) and Broadberry (2007). steam engine, the internal combustion engine and electrification (both associated with the second industrial revolution of the late 19th and early 20th centuries), and recent information and communication technologies (ICT) (sometimes…”
• What is specific about evolutionary economics? (2008, background): “…innovation studies with the classical Schumpeterian themes of technological change, industrial dynamics, and economic growth has generated thriving empirical research that, in many cases, makes little, if any, use of the notion of routines and Darwinian metaphors (see Fagerberg 2003 for a survey).”
• Insights from the Fostering of Innovation Ideas (2007, unknown): “, rules of behavior are changed only when they no longer lead to satisfactory outcomes [27]).”
• Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems (2020, background): “In the broad area of evolutionary economics community (see especially Witt 2008; Fagerberg 2003; Hodgson 2015; Dosi and Nelson 2011; Dosi et al. 2002; Nelson 2011; Nelson and Winter 2002) we draw specifically on the Nelson and Winter tradition and on the work byMetcalfe and colleagues regarding the…”
• Intensity of innovation in public sector organizations: The role of push and pull factors (2020, background): “The role and importance of innovation in economic growth and development has been central デラ デエW ゲデ┌S┞ ラa キミミラ┗;デキラミ W┗Wヴ ゲキミIW “Iエ┌マヮWデWヴげゲ seminal theorizing at the beginning of the ヱΓヰヰげゲ (Fagerberg, 2003; Schumpeter, 1934).”
• Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field (2009, methodology): “As for journals, Research Policy (RP), the oldest nd most established journal in the field, is by far the most pop- 28 See Fagerberg (2003) for a discussion of the sources for Schumpeter’s theorizing including the inspiration from Marx).”