Preference and processing: The role of speech affect in early spoken word recognition

By Leher Singh, James L. Morgan, Katherine S. White. 2004

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb2a0ce6902130ae5d3ab7474f872c483d360112

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Janet F. Werker
2. James L. Morgan
3. Katherine S. White
4. H. H. Yeung
5. David J. Lewkowicz
6. Patricia K. Kuhl
7. Takao K. Hensch
8. Kai Olav Ellefsen

Citations in the corpus

• When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone (2013, background): “This finding is relevant to a broader discussion in the literature about the character f0 variability in infant-directed speech, and how that variability affects early word-learning (Bortfeld & Morgan, 2010; Singh et al., 2004; Singh et al., 2008).”
• Sub-Segmental Detail in Early Lexical Representations. (2008, background): “…they are less sensitive to non-native phonetic contrasts (Anderson, Morgan, & White, 2003; Kuhl, Williams, Lacerda, Stevens, & Lindblom, 1992; Werker & Tees, 1984) and weigh non-linguistic acoustic variation less heavily in word recognition tasks (Houston & Jusczyk, 2000; Singh et al., 2004).”
• Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data (2004, unknown): “We incorporated several refinements in HPP introduced in recent studies (Bortfeld & Morgan, 2000; Singh, Bortfeld, & Morgan, 2002; Singh, Morgan, & White, 2004 ).”