Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data

By Anne Christophe, Sharon Peperkamp, Christophe Pallier, E. Block, Jacques Mehler. 2004

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1734e8bee0fa4fab1edc9b9f723b0890744d44d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. J. Devin McAuley

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. J. Devin McAuley
2. Marina Nespor
3. Ricardo Augusto Hoffmann Bion
4. Erika Marchetto
5. Laura C. Dilley
6. Alan Langus
7. Franck Ramus

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Devin McAuley
2. Marina Nespor
3. Ricardo Augusto Hoffmann Bion
4. Erika Marchetto
5. Laura C. Dilley
6. Alan Langus
7. Franck Ramus

Citations in the corpus

• Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing (2008, background): “Of particular relevance for the present paper is recent work examining effects of proximal prosodic constituents on linguistic processing (Cho, McQueen, & Cox, 2007; Christophe et al., 2004; Gout et al., 2004; Millotte et al., 2008).”
• Can prosody be used to discover hierarchical structure in continuous speech (2012, background): “For example, Intonational Phrase (Kjelgaard & Speer, 1999; Warren, Grabe, & Nolan, 1995), Phonological Phrase (Gout et al., 2004; Millotte et al., 2008) as well as Phonological Word boundaries (Endress & Hauser, 2010; Millotte et al.”