Investigating Frame Strength: The Case of Episodic and Thematic Frames
By L. Aarøe. 2011
259 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0cd5c31fbcf392dae256eab1984045a5553ece1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Sophie Lecheler
- Claes H. de Vreese
- Andreas Schuck
- Dominique S. Wirz
- Patrick Weber
- Katharina Sommer
- Rinaldo Kühne
- James N. Druckman
In Sociology and Political Science
- Sophie Lecheler
- Claes H. de Vreese
- Patrick Weber
- Katharina Sommer
- Rinaldo Kühne
- Andreas Schuck
- Arthur Lupia
- Dominique S. Wirz
Citations in the corpus
- Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments (2016, background): “Others have replicated these results with other issues, such as urban sprawl, a hate group rally, a Danish marriage rule, immigration, health care, and the Patriot Act (e.g., Aarøe 2011; Chong & Druckman 2007, 2010; Druckman et al. 2013; Holm 2012).”
- Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects (2012, background): “This brings our research into accordance with other studies in this field (e.g., Aarøe, 2011; Gross, 2008).”
- Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures (2015, background): “For instance, Aarøe (2011) investigated the influence of thematic and episodic news frames about an immigration act on emotions.”
- The Mediating Role of Emotions (2015, background): “This matters, if one considers recent research suggesting that frames that cause emotions are more effective in influencing opinions and attitudes (Aarøe, 2011; Gross, 2008).”
- Persuasion Through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication (2018, background): “Political communication is generally more persuasive when appeals are emotional rather than rational (Aarøe, 2011; Gross, 2008).”