Inbreeding and Outbreeding Depression in Natural Populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae)

By C. Fenster, L. Galloway. 2000

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa36616cd061d836d7b09b9d6b2ac6a26a80e527

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. (2004, background): “Initial heterosis, followed by outbreeding depression, has been observed recently in taxa as diverse as angiosperms [ 62 ,63],”
Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective (2011, background): “The benefits of crossing populations (F1 and/or F2 compared to parental means) typically increase as the parental populations are more inbred (Fenster and Galloway 2000).”
Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management (2006, background): “This is the proposed explanation for hybrid breakdown being delayed until the F3 in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fenster & Galloway 2000a, b), although it is possible that fitness problems began in the F2 but were obscured by maternal heterosis in the F1.”
How successful are plant species reintroductions (2011, background): “Outbreeding depression is normally measured in the second and following generations (Lynch, 1991; Fenster and Galloway, 2000).”
What is the fitness outcome of crossing unrelated fish populations? A meta-analysis and an evaluation of future research directions (2007, background): “Empirical studies in plants bear out this prediction ( Fenster and Galloway 2000; Waser et al. 2000), but the use of geographic distance as a measure for genetic distance is not necessarily reliable (Quilichini et al. 2001).”
Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis (2004, background): “Outbreeding depression, however, is normally manifest in the second and later generations as a result of recombination between parental genomes, and is unlikely to be seen in the first generation (Lynch Conservation Biology Volume 18, No. 3, June 2004 1991; Fenster & Galloway 2000).”
Assisted Gene Flow to Facilitate Local Adaptation to Climate Change (2013, background): “In some cases, the greatest extent of this breakdown can occur in later generations (Fenster & Galloway 2000).”
GENETIC ISOLATION BY ENVIRONMENT OR DISTANCE: WHICH PATTERN OF GENE FLOW IS MOST COMMON? (2014, background): “…incompatibilities (interactions between genes) have been explored theoretically (e.g., Antonovics 1968; Edmands and Timmerman 2003) and demonstrated empirically (e.g., De Meester 1993; Edmands 1999; Fenster and Galloway 2000; Marr et al. 2002; Tallmon et al. 2004; Costa e Silva et al. 2012).”
Predicting the Probability of Outbreeding Depression (2011, background): “However, inbreeding will increase in populations subject to bottlenecks, and when the populations are crossed they are likely to show genetic rescue effects that tend to mask Conservation Biology Volume 25, No. 3, 2011 OD due to coadaptive differences (Fenster & Galloway 2000a).”
Extinction risk in fragmented habitats (2004, unknown): “…experiments (Forney & Gilpin, 1989; Spielman & Frankham, 1992; Backus et al., 1995; Bryant et al., 1999; Richards, 2000; Newman & Tallmon, 2001) and in natural populations (Westemeier et al., 1998; Madsen et al., 1999; Fenster & Galloway, 2000; Comiskey et al., 2002; Cooper & Walters, 2002).”