What is the fitness outcome of crossing unrelated fish populations? A meta-analysis and an evaluation of future research directions

By E. McClelland, Kerry A. Naish. Conservation Genetics, 2007

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4399a54305dec45642170233665d8309dfc18fd2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. R. Frankham
2. A. Hoffmann
3. R. Lacy
4. M. Byrne
5. C. Sgrò
6. J. Ballou
7. C. Fenster
8. K. Ralls

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. C. Fenster
2. R. Frankham
3. A. Hoffmann
4. R. Lacy
5. D. Coates
6. M. Byrne
7. A. Young
8. K. Ralls

Citations in the corpus

• Predicting the Probability of Outbreeding Depression (2011, background): “Fixation of chromosomal rearrangements results from either genetic drift overwhelming heterozygote disadvantage (Lande 1979; Coyne 1984) or from natural selection (White 1973; Rieseberg 2001).”
• Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective (2011, background): “Neutral locus divergence is a poor predictor of outbreeding depression (McClelland and Naish 2007), but rather shows a positive relationship with F1 mean for quantitative characters (McClelland and Naish 2007), predicting heterosis rather than outbreeding depression.”
• Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Environmental Change and Management Actions for Migrating Fish (2019, background): “…biodiversity, such as removal of migration barriers, installation of fishways, compensatory breeding, supplementary stocking, and translocations (Gjedrem et al., 1991; Berg et al., 1997; Søndergaard et al., 2000; McClelland and Naish, 2007; Seddon et al., 2007; Frankham, 2008; Service USFW, 2012).”
• Bridging the gap between the genotype and the phenotype: linking genetic variation, selection and adaptation in fishes (2008, background): “In a meta-analysis of consequences of interbreeding between fish populations (McClelland and Naish 2007), it was found that fitness outcomes of one or two generations of interbreeding between populations that were distinct at neutral markers were generally difficult to predict.”
• Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. (2015, background): “The meta-analysis of fish crosses by McClelland & Naish (2007) also did not find F1 > F2, while that of Whitlock et al. (2013) found F1 > F2 for fitness traits across diverse animal and plant taxa.”