How successful are plant species reintroductions

By S. Godefroid, C. Piazza, G. Rossi, Stéphane Buord, Albert-Dieter Stevens, R. Aguraiuja, C. Cowell, C. Weekley, G. Vogg, José María Iriondo and 10 more. 2011

677 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Coral restoration – A systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions (2020, background): “To place these values in context within the broader restoration ecology field, an average survival of 66% is substantially higher than that reported in terrestrial ecological restoration, where outplant success tends to fall below 50% [64,65].”
Genetic considerations in ecosystem restoration using native tree species (2014, neutral): “…practice are often not well understood but include planting material that is inadequately matched to the environmental conditions at the restoration site and inappropriate silvicultural approaches and techniques (Kettle, 2010; Godefroid et al., 2011; Le et al., 2012; Wenying et al., 2013).”
Restoring species through reintroductions: strategies for source population selection (2015, background): “Across all approaches, post-translocation monitoring (e.g. survival, body size, and population size) for at least 10 years is recommended for measuring restoration success (Fischer & Lindenmayer 2000; Menges 2008; Godefroid et al. 2011).”