Assessment of Alternative Harvest Regulations for Sustaining Recreational Fisheries: Model Development and Application to Bull Trout

By J. Post, Craig J. Mushens, A. Paul, M. Sullivan. 2003

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa32cf33b06e24a9682fe80590d5cbf81f4769d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Fish life history, angler behaviour and optimal management of recreational fisheries (2013, unknown): “When predicting the impacts of recreational fishing, one needs to consider not only fish life history but also the preferences and dynamics of anglers utilizing a fishery (Post et al. 2003; Johnston et al. 2010).”
Dynamic angling effort influences the value of minimum‐length limits to prevent recruitment overfishing (2013, methodology): “The numerical response to angler effort in year t (Et, h (ha yr 1)) was assumed to be related to vulnerable biomass using a logistic function, similar to recreational fisheries models by Post et al. (2003) and Arlinghaus et al. (2009): Et ¼ 1 .”
Methods for Assessing Fish Populations (2010, background): “Thus, status and trends in abundance, size or age structure, maturity schedules, or fecundity of fish in a population are central to informed decision making (Ault and Olson 1996; Post et al. 2003).”
Documented and Potential Biological Impacts of Recreational Fishing: Insights for Management and Conservation (2006, background): “Obviously the exploitation rate varies with angling effort (Moring, 1993; Cox and Walters, 2002; Post et al., 2003), but it is also influenced by regulations (Miranda and Allen, 2000; Beard et al., 2003a; Näslund et al., 2005), e.g., opening time and duration of the fishing period (Gunn and Sein,…”
The conservation and fishery benefits of protecting large pike Esox lucius L. by harvest regulations in recreational fishing (2010, background): “Note that this model ignores regional angler dynamics, i.e., anglers choose a particular water body depending on the quality of that fishery only (Post et al., 2003).”
Assessing evolutionary consequences of size-selective recreational fishing on multiple life-history traits, with an application to northern pike (Esox lucius) (2011, background): “1d) measures the portion of fish of age a that is vulnerable to angling (with other fish at age a being invulnerable to angling, e.g., due to size-dependent gape limitation to hooking or due to the choice of safe habitats; Post et al. 2003).”
Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model (2010, methodology): “1a; Table 3), an approach used in previous recreational-fishing models (Cox et al. 2003; Post et al. 2003).”