Toward Ethical Information Systems: The Contribution of Discourse Ethics

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development (2012, background): “…“incommensurable moral premises” rather than approaches to reach a consensus on values, norms, and decisions often found in conventional (analytical) moral philosophy (e.g., Habermas (1988) on rational dialogue and communicative action; see Mingers and Walsham (2010) for an application to IS).”
Ethical norms and issues in crowdsourcing practices: A Habermasian analysis (2018, methodology): “It has been argued that this approach has strong explanatory and normative power in relation to new and complex organizational and social phenomena including those arising in a digitalized society (CecezKecmanovic and Marjanovic 2015; Heng and De Moor 2003; Mingers and Walsham 2010; Reinecke and Ans”
Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of 'datification' (2015, background): “…or means by which an individual does something, rather than the outcome, is the focus of decision-making (e.g. lying is dishonest as it is one’s duty to be honest regardless of whether this might lead to some ultimate good), therefore the end never justifies the means (Mingers and Walsham, 2010).”